How many Palestinians and Israelis remember life before the occupation, 56 years ago?
If we assume that a person only develops a sociopolitical consciousness after the age of ten, then we should check the proportion of both populations that are 65 or older. In Palestinian society, the proportion is a mere 3%. In Israel it’s higher (around 11%). But given the fact that many of the Israelis in that age group immigrated from the former Soviet Union only during the 1990s, it is safe to assume that in Israel too, the proportion is somewhere in the single digits, or less than one in 10.
Think about it: we have two entire societies – almost three generations – that have been conditioned to perceive their relationship as one of occupier and occupied.
Think about it: we have two entire societies – almost three generations – that have been conditioned to perceive their relationship as one of occupier and occupied. Three generations that exclusively experienced this “temporary situation” as the only way of life they know. Beyond that, majorities in both societies do not remember life before the second intifada, which put Israelis and Palestinians on a perpetual collision course of on-again-off-again violence.
What happens to two societies in conflict, which internalize occupation as a way of life, the only way of life they know? What happens to the occupiers and what happens to the occupied? You don’t need a degree in sociology to answer this question. It’s enough to read the papers, or, even better, visit Israel and Palestine. Many Israelis and Palestinians cannot even imagine life differently.
I often talk to Palestinians about what life is like for them, having experienced more than half a century of suffering, oppression, humiliation and hopelessness under a brutal military occupation. I can only imagine and express empathy and solidarity.
I am more than familiar with Israeli society’s reaction to the occupation, particularly in the past 23 years, since the beginning of the traumatizing violence of the second intifada. Most Israelis have stopped believing in the viability of an Israeli-Palestinian political settlement.
On the other hand, I am more than familiar with Israeli society’s reaction to the occupation, particularly in the past 23 years, since the beginning of the traumatizing violence of the second intifada. Most Israelis have stopped believing in the viability of an Israeli-Palestinian political settlement. Shalom (peace), a word that once dominated Israeli election campaigns and aspirational political speeches, has become synonymous with weakness and naiveté and all but disappeared from political discourse. Disappointed and disillusioned, many Israelis ceased to care about the plight of their Palestinian neighbors and about the prospects of living in peace with them. For our friends in Israel’s peace movement and, by extension, for my organization in the United States, the chief challenge has been battling apathy and nihilism.
The 56th year of the occupation has ushered in an Israeli government that, disastrously, is determined to infinitely perpetuate the occupation, that is unless they move ahead with their stated goal of annexation and kill any chance for a future compromise-based peace.
But it also saw the rise of a protest movement, the likes of which Israel has never seen.
I know, the protest is not focused on the occupation. Demonstrators are there to defend democracy and justice for Israelis, not for Palestinians. Still, I see the protest as the most promising development in recent memory in the struggle against the occupation. The movement has transformed hundreds of thousands of Israelis from apathetic cynics to political activists. It has exposed them to anti-occupation messaging by the tenacious demonstrators who insist on infusing the demonstrations with their chants and billboards. The protest movement went from shunning to tolerating and even embracing the Anti-Occupation Bloc (Ha-Gush Neged Hakibush, sounds catchier in Hebrew), a vociferous coalition of anti-occupation organizations that has mainstreamed the slogan “There is no Democracy with Occupation.”
No, protest will not reverse the occupation, certainly not under the current Israeli government. But it is already disrupting the Israeli public’s complicity toward the reality that they have otherwise ignored for decades.
And while this complicity disruption is far from ending the occupation, it is an essential first step and a powerful change. We think it’s essential, not just in Israel, but also in the United States.
We won’t allow the US government – either the administration and Congress – to talk the ritualized talk about a two-state solution without walking the walk to implement it. We won’t let our government talk about Palestinian statehood as a US strategic goal without helping lay the foundation for a state. And we won’t let fellow Jewish groups pay lip service to the damage that West Bank settlements cause to prospects of future peace without acting against settlement expansion and settler violence.
Fifty-six years later, the immediate imperative is to denormailze the occupation. It’s an ongoing effort. And the more we commit to it, the more likely we are to keep the path open for future peace.
Hadar Susskind is the President and CEO of Americans for Peace Now.
56 Years Later, Let’s De-Normalize the Occupation
Hadar Susskind
How many Palestinians and Israelis remember life before the occupation, 56 years ago?
If we assume that a person only develops a sociopolitical consciousness after the age of ten, then we should check the proportion of both populations that are 65 or older. In Palestinian society, the proportion is a mere 3%. In Israel it’s higher (around 11%). But given the fact that many of the Israelis in that age group immigrated from the former Soviet Union only during the 1990s, it is safe to assume that in Israel too, the proportion is somewhere in the single digits, or less than one in 10.
Think about it: we have two entire societies – almost three generations – that have been conditioned to perceive their relationship as one of occupier and occupied. Three generations that exclusively experienced this “temporary situation” as the only way of life they know. Beyond that, majorities in both societies do not remember life before the second intifada, which put Israelis and Palestinians on a perpetual collision course of on-again-off-again violence.
What happens to two societies in conflict, which internalize occupation as a way of life, the only way of life they know? What happens to the occupiers and what happens to the occupied? You don’t need a degree in sociology to answer this question. It’s enough to read the papers, or, even better, visit Israel and Palestine. Many Israelis and Palestinians cannot even imagine life differently.
I often talk to Palestinians about what life is like for them, having experienced more than half a century of suffering, oppression, humiliation and hopelessness under a brutal military occupation. I can only imagine and express empathy and solidarity.
On the other hand, I am more than familiar with Israeli society’s reaction to the occupation, particularly in the past 23 years, since the beginning of the traumatizing violence of the second intifada. Most Israelis have stopped believing in the viability of an Israeli-Palestinian political settlement. Shalom (peace), a word that once dominated Israeli election campaigns and aspirational political speeches, has become synonymous with weakness and naiveté and all but disappeared from political discourse. Disappointed and disillusioned, many Israelis ceased to care about the plight of their Palestinian neighbors and about the prospects of living in peace with them. For our friends in Israel’s peace movement and, by extension, for my organization in the United States, the chief challenge has been battling apathy and nihilism.
The 56th year of the occupation has ushered in an Israeli government that, disastrously, is determined to infinitely perpetuate the occupation, that is unless they move ahead with their stated goal of annexation and kill any chance for a future compromise-based peace.
But it also saw the rise of a protest movement, the likes of which Israel has never seen.
I know, the protest is not focused on the occupation. Demonstrators are there to defend democracy and justice for Israelis, not for Palestinians. Still, I see the protest as the most promising development in recent memory in the struggle against the occupation. The movement has transformed hundreds of thousands of Israelis from apathetic cynics to political activists. It has exposed them to anti-occupation messaging by the tenacious demonstrators who insist on infusing the demonstrations with their chants and billboards. The protest movement went from shunning to tolerating and even embracing the Anti-Occupation Bloc (Ha-Gush Neged Hakibush, sounds catchier in Hebrew), a vociferous coalition of anti-occupation organizations that has mainstreamed the slogan “There is no Democracy with Occupation.”
No, protest will not reverse the occupation, certainly not under the current Israeli government. But it is already disrupting the Israeli public’s complicity toward the reality that they have otherwise ignored for decades.
And while this complicity disruption is far from ending the occupation, it is an essential first step and a powerful change. We think it’s essential, not just in Israel, but also in the United States.
We won’t allow the US government – either the administration and Congress – to talk the ritualized talk about a two-state solution without walking the walk to implement it. We won’t let our government talk about Palestinian statehood as a US strategic goal without helping lay the foundation for a state. And we won’t let fellow Jewish groups pay lip service to the damage that West Bank settlements cause to prospects of future peace without acting against settlement expansion and settler violence.
Fifty-six years later, the immediate imperative is to denormailze the occupation. It’s an ongoing effort. And the more we commit to it, the more likely we are to keep the path open for future peace.
Hadar Susskind is the President and CEO of Americans for Peace Now.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
The Assault: A Coordinated Attack on America’s Jews and Israel
We Need Tactical Training to Combat Campus Antisemitism
Chico Menashe: Asif: Culinary Institute of Israel, Cooking with Chutzpah and The Open Kitchen Project
Print Issue: In the Shadow of Nova | May 3, 2024
A Moment in Time: “Our Educators Need to Learn Their ABC‘S”
Rosner’s Domain | If We Can’t Change Them …
Culture
Welcome Back, Carbs!
A Perfect Pair of Confits
‘The Enemy Beside Me’: Can the Truth of Lithuania Holocaust History Be Told in Lithuania to Lithuanians and By Lithuanians?
A History of a Pivotal Era in Palestine Wins a Top Jewish Book Prize
LA Jewish Symphony Anniversary, OBKLA Preps Meals, Jews of Color Discussion
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
“Quo Vadis?” An Interview with Erika Jacoby
“Quo Vadis?” As I entered my cousin Erika Jacoby’s home, she looked me in the eye and asked me the question: Quo Vadis?
Arab Activist Loay Alshareef on Middle East Peace and Touring U.S. Campuses
What Alshareef believes will change people’s minds – even those who are radicalized – is education.
Echoes of History: Educating the Next Generation Through the David Labkovski Project
The educational initiative, known as The David Labkovski Project (DLP), offers a unique approach to combating antisemitism and educating about the Holocaust.
Table for Five: Acharei Mot
Temple of the Heart
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Chico Menashe: Asif: Culinary Institute of Israel, Cooking with Chutzpah and The Open Kitchen Project
Beth Lee: OMG Yummy, Exciting Flavors and Preserved Lemons
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.