Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

Israel uses new surveillance technology to distance itself from the occupation. It’s not working

Up until a few months ago, Israeli Jews were convinced I was lying to them when I told them soldiers go into Palestinian homes to “map” the house and the people living in it. Every night, soldiers entered the homes of “uninvolved civilians” —meaning people who are suspected of nothing other than being Palestinian —not to arrest or seize weapons. Instead they woke everyone up, children and adults alike. Sometimes the soldiers took pictures of them, sometimes they just wrote down their names and then went off into the night.

The underlying tactic behind these missions has always been to “demonstrate our presence,” a prevalent part of many of the IDF’s missions and practices in the West Bank. Its goal is to constantly remind the Palestinians that the military is anywhere and everywhere, a tactic also referred to as creating “a feeling of being chased.” Whether in mapping missions, village center patrols or random checkpoints, the goal of “demonstrating presence” over Palestinians is a backbone of Israeli policy. The practices and tools might change and evolve throughout the years, but the intention behind them remains the same.

At least some of these new tools were revealed this month by The Washington Post: Israel keeps an invasive database on Palestinians called Wolf Pack. Some of the soldiers who worked with the database described it as “Facebook for Palestinians.” Soldiers were sent to compete in photographing Palestinians in order to put as many Palestinian faces into the system, using a specialized smartphone app called “Blue Wolf.” In Hebron, the military uses a complex monitoring and surveillance system called “Hebron Smart City,” which uses cameras and sensors to watch Palestinians every second of every day, sometimes inside their own homes.

Almost every combat soldier who served in the occupied territories has been involved in a “mapping mission.” I did it myself during my military service. And still, Israelis did not want to believe it was happening, and if it was, there must have been no other choice.

In June, Maj. Gen. Tamir Yadai, the commander of the IDF’s Central Command announced that this nefarious “mapping” practice (the one we were surely lying about), was now being canceled. The night raids into the homes of innocent Palestinians, the trauma inflicted upon frightened children’s psyches are no longer deemed necessary. The decision was made following “developments and improvements in the military’s information-gathering abilities,” he said. There is no need for the disturbing images of soldiers photographing crying children in their homes in the dead of night. That method has become obsolete, as we have upgraded to our own version of 1984-style surveillance.

In some ways, this use of high-tech means is the natural, almost obvious, progression of a sustained process of rebranding the occupation. The shadow government that runs Palestinians’ lives, and for which they cannot vote, is referred to as the Civil Administration, as if it wasn’t run by soldiers and as if the Palestinians are citizens rather than subjects without basic rights. Its branches are “Liaison and Coordination Offices,” invoking the image of a civic service provider rather than a military apparatus that decides who among the Palestinians gets to have a movement permit and whose house is to be demolished. The checkpoints have become “crossings,” and soldiers haven’t served in many of the larger ones for years. They have been replaced by Crossings Authority personnel —a privatization move that has allowed the Israeli government to wash its hands of responsibility for one of the occupation’s most notorious points of friction, occurring on a daily basis.

The occupation of the Palestinian territories is perhaps the longest, most expensive and most significant foreign relations project in Israel’s history. Those who shepherd it have always been painfully aware of the need to defend the occupation’s reputation from potential criticism from the international community and Israel’s own citizens. “Mapping” is not something that goes down quietly. Ask your friends who have done combat military service — it’s hard to forget the faces of terrified children, and images of masked soldiers inside a Palestinian living room are never going to look good. But a good photo of a biometric database, on the other hand, is really hard to find, and even harder to fight against.

Underneath these technological advancements and cosmetic veneers, the occupation has not changed all that much. Israel has certainly learned how to dress it up in pretty words. We’ve learned that occupation inevitably produces friction, so we have found ways to shift the friction over to the Palestinian side by actively engaging them in their homes and streets, making it nearly invisible to the Israeli public. Israelis have become experts at avoiding images that might haunt us later.

The Palestinians do not have the same luxury of avoidance. The occupation is an ever present part of their lives. They continue to live with the child arrests and protest the deaths we try our best to look away from. They experience the military’s show of force in the middle of their villages and the random roadblocks every single day. Now they are the subjects of a mass surveillance project that effectively ignores their basic human rights.

Palestinians aren’t the only ones who see the occupation for what it is. The Washington Post article clearly exposed what’s wrong with a system that Israel created in the occupied territories that watches, photographs and catalogs. It doesn’t take more than a glance to recognize a prison.

To contact the author, email [email protected].

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we need 500 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Our Goal: 500 gifts during our Passover Pledge Drive!

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.